Bombay High Court
CP/222/2021 of RAJENDRA NAVNATH GARKAL Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 2 November 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 8 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.222 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO.374/2020 RAJENDRA NAVNATH GARKAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioner : Adv.Monika V. Boldhane h/f Mr.H.V.Tungar AGP for respondent-State :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
222.21CP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 8 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.222 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO.374/2020 RAJENDRA NAVNATH GARKAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioner : Adv.Monika V. Boldhane h/f Mr.H.V.Tungar AGP for respondent-State : Mr.G.A.Kulkarni … 9 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 223 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3741/2020 VAISHALI RADHAKISAN SHINDE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioner : Adv.Monika V. Boldhane h/f Mr.H.V.Tungar AGP for respondent-State : Mr.Rajdeep D. Raut ... 10 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 224 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3743/2020 KALYAN ANURATH ANIRUDRA JOGDAND AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioner : Adv.Monika V. Boldhane h/f Mr.H.V.Tungar AGP for respondent-State : Mr.S.J.Salgare ... 11 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 225 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO.396/2020 SHIVAJI BHAGWAT GARKAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS 2026:BHC-AUG:54211-DB
222.21CP
... Advocate for the petitioner : Adv.Monika V. Boldhane h/f Mr.H.V.Tungar AGP for respondent-State : Mr.N.B.Patil …
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 02.11.2026 ORDER : [PER : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order under contempt is complied with.
In view of the same, the Contempt Petitions are disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC