Bombay High Court

IA/1796/2026 of MANGAL RAJENDRA PETKAR AND ORS. Vs RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. THR. DIVISIONAL MANAGER on 5 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1796 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1380 OF 2025 Mangal Rajendra Petkar And Ors. … Applicants V/s. Reliance General Insurance Co.ltd. Thr. Divisional Manager … Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1796 OF 2026

IN

FIRST APPEAL NO. 1380 OF 2025

Mangal Rajendra Petkar And Ors.

…

Applicants

V/s.

Reliance General Insurance Co.ltd. Thr.

Divisional Manager

…

Respondent

________________________

Adv. Santosh Kumar Bhosale (through V.C.), for Applicant.

Adv. Aditya Ghadge h/f Adv. Akshay Kulkarni, for Appellant/Insurance Company.

_________________________

CORAM

: SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATED

: NOVEMBER 05, 2026

P.C.:

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1796 OF 2026

IN

1.

By this Application, the Applicants seek to withdraw amount deposited by the respondent Insurance Company.

2.

For the reasons stated in the application, the amount is sought to be withdrawn.

3.

It is contended that the Tribunal has rightly arrived at the quantum. Applicants have placed on record cogent material in support

adn

26-IA-1796-2026-(C).doc

of their claim.

4.

The counsel for the respondent-Insurance Company submits that notional income considered by the Tribunal is excessive. The deceased was a bachelor and, therefore, deduction should have been 1/2 instead of 1/3. Interest awarded is excessive.

5.

I have considered the submissions of the parties and also have gone through the impugned judgment. The deceased was pharmacist and the applicants were dependent upon him.

6.

Considering the conspectus of the matter, it would be appropriate to allow the applicant to receive 70% of the amount deposited by respondent-Insurance Company with accrued interest. Hence, I pass the following order :

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(i) Interim Application is partly allowed, permitting the applicants to withdraw 70% of deposited amount by respondent-Insurance Company with accrued interest on furnishing undertaking to the satisfaction of jurisdictional Tribunal.

(ii) The Balance amount shall be invested in the Nationalized Bank.

7. Admit.

8. Call for record and proceedings.

9. Print is dispensed with.

adn

26-IA-1796-2026-(C).doc

10. Parties shall be at liberty to file private paper book or compilation of relevant documents.

11. The stay granted by this Court on 24th September, 2025 shall continue to operate until the final disposal of the Appeal. (SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)

adn

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead