Bombay High Court
WP/10236/2019 of SHRI. SACHIN GOPAL DOKE AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS on 4 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10236 OF 2019 Shri. Sachin Gopal Doke and Another ... Petitioners VERSUS State of Maharashtra and Others ... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8696 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION
34-WP-10236-2019 (C).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 10236 OF 2019
Shri. Sachin Gopal Doke and Another
... Petitioners
VERSUS
State of Maharashtra and Others
... Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8696 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 10236 OF 2019
The Special Land Acquisition Oicer No. 7
Mohol (Solapur)
… Applicant
In the matter between
Shri. Sachin Gopal Doke and Another
... Petitioners
VERSUS
State of Maharashtra and Others
... Respondents
…
Mr. Gajanan Mahadev Savagave, Advocate for Petitioners.
Mr. Ravi P. Kadam, ‘B’ Panel Counsel for Respondent-State.
…
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH &
ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 04, 2026.
P. C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Petition was iled seeking a declaration of lapsing of acquisition under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Shubham 1 of
34-WP-10236-2019 (C).doc
2. The reply aidavit of Respondent Nos. 3, 4, 7, 8 and 9 indicates that the compensation amount was received by the landowner on 26th March 1973 and that possession was taken by the Land Acquisition Oicer through a panchnama and possession receipt dated 27th September 1973.
3. In view of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal & Ors. Etc.1, the Petition fails and stands dismissed.
4. In view of the disposal of the Writ Petition, nothing survives for consideration in the pending Civil/Interim Applications, and the same stand disposed of. [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.] [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]
(2020) 8 SCC 129 Shubham 2 of