Bombay High Court

APPP/3583/2026 of SWAPNIL S/O DAYAKAR CHOUDHARI Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PSO, PS, SHWGAON, DIST. CHANDRAPUR on 5 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APPP] NO. 3583 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION [BA] NO. 624 OF 2025. Swapnil Dayakar Choudhari

- VERSUS - State of Maharashtra __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Shri P.S. Jaiswal, Advocate h/f. Shri A.C. Jaltare, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms S.N. Thakur, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant/State.

CORAM :

M.M. NERLIKAR, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 05, 2026. Heard.

2. By this application, the applicant is seeking relaxation of condition no.(v) incorporated in order dated 27.11.2025, which reads as under : “(v) The applicant shall attend the concerned police station on every Monday and Saturday between 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.,.”

3. The learned Counsel submits that due to said condition, the applicant is facing problem, as Rgd. 2026:BHC-NAG:15155

Order

whenever he wanted to attend the police station, he was required to seek leave from his employer, however, now his employer is not granting leave and therefore, he is not able to attend the police station, therefore, there is every possibility that if the said condition is not complied, his bail could be cancelled. He therefore, seeks relaxation from said condition no.(v).

4. On the other hand, the learned A.P.P. submits that this condition is necessary in order to secure presence of the applicant, and therefore, considering the nature of allegations, the said condition may not be relaxed.

5. I have considered the submissions canvassed and also the condition no.(v) incorporated in order dated 27.11.2025. Now almost one year is over, and the applicant is attending the police station regularly, however, on account of the problem pointed out by the applicant, I am of the considered opinion that the said condition can be relaxed, however, another condition can be imposed. Hence, the following order. Rgd.

Order

ORDER

(a) Criminal Application is allowed and disposed of.

(b) The condition no.(v) incorporated in the order dated 27.11.2025, is hereby relaxed.

(c) The applicant shall attend the Sessions Court regularly, without fail. JUDGE Rgd. Signed by: R.G. Dhuriya (RGD) Designation: Senior Pvt. Secretary Date: 05/11/2026 16:34:33

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead