Bombay High Court

CAF/4476/2026 of EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MAN PROJECT DIVISION, KHAMGAON, AKOLA Vs DNYANDEO NARAYAN TAMBLE AND OTHERS on 5 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH

74 74 fa 864-2026.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO.4476 OF 2026

IN

FIRST APPEAL NO. 864 OF 2026

Executive Engineer, Man Project Division, Khamgaon, Akola

VERSUS

Dnyandeo Narayan Tamble And Others

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Shri Neelesh Gaidhane, Advocate for appellant Shri S.N. Chikhale, Advocate for respondent No.1

Ms Prachi Joshi, AGP for respondents/State CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 05.11.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. By this application, the respondent No.1 seeks permission for withdrawal of the amount which is deposited by the appellant before this Court.

2. The respondent No.1 has pointed out that he is prosecuting his cause since years together and he is now in advance age and is in need of the amount awarded by the Reference Court in the matter.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant strongly opposed the application. According to him, if entire amount is allowed to be withdrawn, the main purpose of filing the appeal would be frustrated in the matter.

74 74 fa 864-2026.odt

4. The applicant/claimant is prosecuting his cause in the matter since last more than 10 years. There are likely chances to take some time to decide the present appeal in view of pendency of large number of cases before this Court. Hence, applicant/claimant i.e. respondent No.1 is permitted to withdraw 75% amount out of the entire amount deposited by appellant before this Court, subject to furnishing an undertaking that in case appeal is allowed, applicant/claimant will deposit entire amount with interest before this Court.

5. The applicant/claimant disputed the amount deposited by appellant in the matter. According to him, appellant has not done proper calculation in the matter. The said issue is kept open at this stage.

6. Application stands disposed of.

(PRAVIN S. PATIL J.) R.S. Sahare

Signed by: Mrs. Ranjana Sahare Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 06/11/2026 13:47:45

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead