Bombay High Court
APEAL/784/2023 of RESHMA ANJUM SHAIKH W/O SHAIKH MUKHTAR Vs STATE OF MAH. THR. PS YASHODHHRA NAGAR NAGPUR AND 2 OTHERS on 5 November 2026
A .784.23.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
01. CRI. A.784.23.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPE
AL NO.784 OF 2023
Reshma Anjum w/o Shaikh Mukhtar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Mr. S. I. Khan, Advocate for appellant. Mr. S. S. Doifode, APP for respondent No.1/State. Mr. Syed Salman Ali Syed J. Ali, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and
3.
CORAM
: SHIVKUMAR DIGE & ROHIT W. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 05th NOVEMBER, 2026 P. C. : . Heard learned advocate for the appellant, learned APP and learned Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
2. The present appeal is filed in order to challenge judgment and order dated 13.06.2023 passed by the learned 5th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Sessions Case No.895 of 2021, whereby the present respondent Nos.2 and 3/ori. Accused were acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 313, 323 and 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
3. The appellant is the first informant and the wife of accused No.1/respondent No.2.
4. Learned advocate for the appellant states that after filing of the appeal, the parties have entered into an amicable settlement,
01. CRI. A.784.23.odt which is recorded by this Court in Criminal Revision No.27 of 2026 and seeks permission to withdraw the appeal accordingly.
5. Permission is granted to withdraw the appeal.
6. Criminal Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
7. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.) (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) T ... αɳɱαყ