Bombay High Court

CAO/239/2025 of UTTAM ASHRU KHARAT THROUGH P.O.A., SANTOSH UTTAM KHARAT Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR, BULDHANA AND OTHERS on 5 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH

54 cao 239-2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.239 OF 2025

IN

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.2714 OF 2025

IN

FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.7065 OF 2023

Uttam Ashru Kharat Through P.O.A., Santosh Uttam Kharat

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra, Through Collector, Buldhana And Others

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Shri D.S. Mapari, Advocate for applicants Shri K.R. Lule, AGP for respondents/State Shri K.P. Mahalle, Advocate for respondent No.3

CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 05.11.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. By this application, the applicant is seeking the condonation of 519 days delay in filing the application for restoration of appeal which was rejected by the order of Registrar (Judicial) for not removing office objections within time.

2. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 519 days is condoned subject to the costs of Rs.1000/- to the ‘Public Welfare Account’ bearing No.129712010001014, IFSC Code UBIN0812978, Union Bank of India, Branch High Court, Civil Lines, Nagpur.

3. The application stands disposed of accordingly.

54 cao 239-2025.odt

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.2714 OF 2025

1. Learned Counsel for the applicant states that inadvertently, the order of the Registrar (Judicial) was not noted down by him and thereby the office objection was not removed within time. Learned Counsel for the applicant states that he is ready to remove all office objections as applicant is interested to prosecute his cause before this Court.

2. Hence, for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed.

3. The order of the Registrar (Judicial) dated 08.08.2023 is recalled.

4. The applicant shall remove the office objections within a period of four weeks.

(PRAVIN S. PATIL J.) R.S. Sahare

Signed by: Mrs. Ranjana Sahare Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 05/11/2026 14:48:25

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead