Calcutta High Court
WPA/6826/2026 of MOTALEB MONDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 13 November 2026
(10) ARDR WPA 6826 of 2026 Motaleb Mondal Vs. The State of West Bengal & ors. Adv. Sudarshan Ghosh, …for the petitioner. Adv. D. N. Ray, Ld. G.P., Adv. Madhu Jana, Adv. Vinayak Chaubey, …for the State. On prayer of the petitioner, the name of the 10th respondent Ayapali Laskar
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
November 13, 2026
(10) ARDR WPA 6826 of 2026
Motaleb Mondal Vs. The State of West Bengal & ors.
Adv. Sudarshan Ghosh, …for the petitioner. Adv. D. N. Ray, Ld. G.P., Adv. Madhu Jana, Adv. Vinayak Chaubey, …for the State.
On prayer of the petitioner, the name of the 10th respondent Ayapali Laskar be expunged from the cause title of the writ petition. The cause title of the writ petition be amended accordingly. Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the recorded owner of the plot in question and submitted a representation on 2nd January, 2026 before the concerned Panchayat for raising a brick boundary wall in the plot in order to protect the plot from damage and nuisance. The representation is yet to be considered. The petitioner seeks consideration of the same. In view of the above, the Pradhan, Baladurganagar Gram Panchayat, being the 7th respondent herein, is directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 2nd January, 2026 within four weeks from the date of communication of this order upon granting reasonable opportunity to all concerned including the petitioner and the private respondents, in accordance with law.
2 The decision taken by the authority shall be communicated to the petitioner within a week thereof. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)