Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/5606/2026 of SMT. MAMTA VASHISHTHA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 4 November 2026
2026:CGHC:46864 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5606 of 2026 Smt. Mamta Vashishtha W/o Shri Vinit Vashishtha Aged About 57 Years Caste - Brahmin, R/o Plot No. 11, Block No. 20-B, Nehru Nagar (West), Bhilai, P.S. Supela, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh ...
CGHC010420622026
2026:CGHC:46864
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 5606 of 2026
Smt. Mamta Vashishtha W/o Shri Vinit Vashishtha Aged About 57 Years Caste - Brahmin, R/o Plot No. 11, Block No. 20-B, Nehru Nagar (West), Bhilai, P.S. Supela, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector/ District Magistrate, Balod Revenue And Civil District Balod Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Gunderdehi, Revenue And Civil District Balod Chhattisgarh 4 - Tehsildar Gunderdehi Tehsil Gunderdehi, Revenue And Civil District Balod Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Petitioner : Mr. K. Ankit, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. Abhiyuday Tripathi, PL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr.
Amitendra Kishore Prasad,
Judge
Order on Board
05.11.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with following reliefs:
“RELIEF SOUGHT:
10.1. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue suitable writ(s), order(s), direction(s) by commanding/directing respondent no.2 (The Collector, District Balod) to consider and decide the pending statutory representation dated 24.09.2026 (Annexure P/2) within a specified time frame, say as for a period of 4 weeks, by passing a reasoned and speaking order after affording personal hearing to the petitioner and all concerned parties.
10.2. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue suitable writ(s), order(s), direction(s) commanding respondent nos. 2 to 4 to carry out an authenticated spot demarcation and correction of the computerized revenue map (Naksha Batankan) of Khasra No. 234 at Mouza Chainganj in light of the Spot Inquiry Report dated 03.07.2026 (Annexure P/1), and restore/deliver actual physical possession of the legitimate share under Khasra No. 234/7 to the petitioner in proportion to the available ground area.
10.3. Any other relief, which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted..”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to anomaly in the online as well as off line application, the petitioner has filed certain application, which has not yet been decided by the concerned Tahsildar. Hence, petitioner has came -up before this
Court with above prayer.
3. Learned State Counsel opposing the relief as prayed for by the petitioner in this petition.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
5. On perusal of documents, it appears that the petitioner has not filed appropriate application before the concerned Tahsildar.
6. Considering the above aspects of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the concerned Tahsildar ventilating his grievance. On receiving of such application, the concerned Tahsildar shall consider the same and to pass appropriate order on its own merits in accordance with law after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as other parties within some stipulated time preferably within 60 days from the date of filing of such application. CC as per rules.
Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge
J.