Chhattisgarh High Court

MCC/1028/2026 of SMT. LALITA BAI Vs RAVI BHARTI on 2 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026:CGHC:46502 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1028 of 2026 1. Smt. Lalita Bai W/o. Late Ganga Prasad Aged About 37 Years R/o. Jemara, Police Station Pali, Tehsil Pali, District- Korba (C.G.) 2. Ku. Preeti D/o Late Ganga Prasad Aged About 5 Years Through Mother- Smt.

CGHC010414302026

2026:CGHC:46502

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

MCC No. 1028 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Smt. Lalita Bai W/o. Late Ganga Prasad Aged About 37 Years R/o. Jemara, Police Station Pali, Tehsil Pali, District- Korba (C.G.)

2. Ku. Preeti D/o Late Ganga Prasad Aged About 5 Years Through Mother- Smt. Lalita Bai, W/o Late Ganga Prasad, Resident of Jemara, Police Station- Pali, Tehsil- Pali, District- Korba Chhattisgarh

3. Dayaram S/o Bir Singh Aged About 65 Years Resident of Jemara, Police Station- Pali, Tehsil- Pali, District- Korba Chhattisgarh

4. Smt. Ind Kunwar W/o Dayaram Aged About 62 Years Resident of Jemara, Police Station- Pali, Tehsil- Pali, District- Korba Chhattisgarh

5. Ku. Kalyani D/o Late Ganga Prasad Aged About 4 Months, Through Mother- Smt. Lalita Bai, W/o Late Ganga Prasad, Caste- Gond, Resident of Jemara, Police Station- Pali, Tehsil- Pali, District- Korba Chhattisgarh,

... Applicants versus

1. Ravi Bharti S/o. Late Gend Bharti Aged About 24 Years R/o. Village Kadari, Police Station Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

2. Manish Sharma S/o Ram Sumer Sharma, Resident of L.I.G. 86, Sharda Vihar, Korba, District- Korba Chhattisgarh

3. New India Insurance Company Limited Through- Branch Manager, Office- Sada Complex, T.P. Nagar, Korba, District- Korba Chhattisgarh

... Respondents For Applicants : None

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order On Board 03.11.2026

1. None appeared on behalf of the applicants to press this application when the case is called out for hearing.

2. This MCC has been filed for restoration of MAC No. 326/2020, which came to be dismissed for non-compliance with the order dated 24.07.2026 passed by this Court.

3. It is evident from the record that, on 24.07.2026, this Court issued notice to the respondents and directed the applicants to pay process fee and furnish copies within a period of seven days. It was further observed that non-compliance with the said direction would result in automatic dismissal of the appeal without further reference to the Bench. However, the process fee, as directed, was not paid and, consequently, the appeal came to be dismissed.

4. The present MCC is also barred by limitation of 39 days, for which an application for condonation of delay, being I.A. No. 1/2026, has been filed.

5. On due consideration, the application is allowed. The delay in filing the MCC is condoned for the reasons stated in the application.

6. For the reasons stated in the restoration application, the MCC is allowed. The order dated 24.07.2026 is recalled, and MAC No. 326/2020 is restored to its original number.

Sd/-

(Sachin Singh Rajput ) Judge Abhishek

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead