Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/846/2020 of BRIJENDRA LAL JAISWAL Vs NAGAR PALIKA PARISAD- BAIKUNTHPUR on 1 November 2026
2026:CGHC:46292 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 846 of 2020 • Brijendra Lal Jaiswal S/o Late Shri Ganga Prasad Jaiswal Aged About 64 Years R/o Baikunthpur Bhattipara, Ward No.05, Opposite Hero Show Room, Police Station Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh.,
CGHC010046072020
2026:CGHC:46292
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 846 of 2020
• Brijendra Lal Jaiswal S/o Late Shri Ganga Prasad Jaiswal Aged About 64
Years R/o Baikunthpur Bhattipara, Ward No.05, Opposite Hero Show Room, Police Station Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh., District :
Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner
versus
1 - Nagar Palika Parisad- Baikunthpur Through Chief Municipal Officer, District Korea Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation Through Managing Director Old Police Head Quarter Premises, Rajbhawan Road Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Director Treasury, Account And Pension, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Regional Provident Fund Office, Block - D, Scheme - 32, Indira Gandhi Commercial Complex, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate
For Respondent No. 1
:
Mr. Bhupendra Singh, Advocate
For Respondent No. 2
:
Mr. Vibhor Goverdhan, Advocate
For Respondent No. 3
:
Ms. Poorva Tiwari, Panel Lawyer
For Respondent No. 4
:
Mr. Sunil Pillai, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board
02.11.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition for issuance of direction to the respondent authorities to release his retiral dues.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the grievance raised by the petitioner has already been redressed, as most of the dues have already been paid to the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the grievance with regard to leave encashment has already been redressed; however, the amount of gratuity paid to the petitioner is less than the amount due and payable to him.
4. Considering the fact that most of the grievances of the petitioner has already been redressed, therefore, nothing is required to be adjudicated by this Court in this petition at this stage.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take recourse available to him under the law with regard to less amount of gratuity paid to him. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika