Chhattisgarh High Court
MAC/1123/2023 of CHOLA M.S. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs SARITA YADAV on 1 November 2026
2026:CGHC:46161 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1123 of 2023 1 - Chola M.S. General Insurance Company Limited Through Divisional Office- Simran Tower, In Front Of L I C Building, Pandri, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. (Insurer Of Vehicle Tractor C.G. 06 G.M. 1704). ...
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CGHC010205932023
2026:CGHC:46161
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1123 of 2023 1 - Chola M.S. General Insurance Company Limited Through Divisional Office- Simran Tower, In Front Of L I C Building, Pandri, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. (Insurer Of Vehicle Tractor C.G. 06 G.M. 1704).
... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Sarita Yadav W/o Gowardhan Yadav Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Boirlami, Thana Tendukona, Tahsil And District Mahasamund, C.G. (Claimants). 2 - Shankarlal Yadav S/o Kartikram Yadav Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Boirlami, Thana Tendukona, Tahsil And District Mahasamund, C.G. (Claimants). 3 - Savitribai Yadav W/o Shankarlal Yadav Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Boirlami, Thana Tendukona, Tahsil And District Mahasamund, C.G. (Claimants). 4 - Pitambar Bariha S/o Bhojram Bariha R/o Village Boirlami, Thana Tendukona, Tahsil And District Mahasamund, C.G. (Owner Of Vehicle Tractor C.G. 06 G.M. 1704).
... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ashish Pandey, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Judgment on Board 02/11/2026 This appeal is listed today for non-compliance with the order dated 14.07.2023 passed by this Court, as the process fee has not been paid.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the defects would be cured during the course of the day.
3. The present appeal has been preferred under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, against the award dated 10.11.2022 passed by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Labour Court, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.), in Case No. 33/W.C. Act/2019 (Fatal), whereby compensation of Rs.4,38,820/- along with interest @ 12% per annum has been awarded in favour of respondent Nos. 1 to 3/claimants.
4. The appeal is also barred by limitation by 167 days. While entertaining the appeal, this Court, vide order dated 14.07.2023, issued notice to the respondents on the application for condonation of delay and directed the appellant to pay the process fee within seven working days. However, despite the lapse of more than three years, the appellant has failed to comply with the said direction and pay the requisite process fee.
5. In view of the aforesaid non-compliance, this Court is not inclined to grant any further time. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance with the order dated 14.07.2023 passed by this Court. Sd/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput)
JUDGE Pawan