Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/43/2026 of Jakenso Chikro Vs Millo Kojin and 4 Ors on 9 November 2026
GAHC040015992026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/43/2026 Jakenso Chikro Son of Shri Thidilum Chikro, resident of Old ALC Line, Walong, Anjaw District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Millo Kojin and 4 Ors
GAHC040015992026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/43/2026
Jakenso Chikro
Son of Shri Thidilum Chikro, resident of Old ALC Line, Walong, Anjaw District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
Millo Kojin and 4 Ors
Deputy Commissioner, Hawai, Anjaw District, Arunachal Pradesh.
2:Harpal
Singh (Lieutenant General)
Age: 0
Occupation :
the Director General
BRO
Sema Sadak Bhawan
Ring Road
Naraina
Delhi Cantonment
New Delhi 110010
3:APS Negi (Lieutenant Colonel)
Age: 0
Occupation :
Officer Commanding
116 RCC (GREF)
Hayuliang (Zero Mele)
Anjaw District
Arunachal Pradesh 792104
4:Pankaj Sarwat
Age: 0
Occupation :
Commander 48 BRTF Demwe
Tezu
Lohit District
Arunachal Pradesh 792001
5:S K Verma
Age: 0
Occupation :
Chief Engineer of Project Udayak
Doomdooma
Tinsukia District
Assam 93171
Advocate for the Petitioner : Sunil Mow, Sonam Tsomo Advocate for the Respondent : Marto Kato, Liya Keche,Kamin Teri,Oli Jerang,Tony Meto,Yasmin Gao,Mipe Ete,Nyali Sora BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 10.11.2026 Heard Mr. S. Mow, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Ratan, learned counsel for the alleged contemnor No. 1 and Mr. M. Kato, learned counsel for the alleged contemnor Nos. 2 to 5. Mr. N. Ratan, learned counsel for the alleged contemnor No. 1, by placing a copy of the communication dated 28.09.2026, issued by the alleged contemnor No. 1, i.e. the Deputy Commissioner, Anjaw District, submits that the land acquisition estimate in respect of Changwinti-Walong-Namti Defence Road (Hawai Tri-Junction Road), from Km 0.00 to Km 59.504, has already been assessed under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFTLARR Act, 2013) and submitted the assessed amount of Rs. 97,50,08,193.49/- to the Director (Land
Management), Government of Arunachal Pradesh, for necessary action. Perusal of the aforesaid communication dated 28.09.2026 appears that the order of this Court dated 24.03.2026, passed in WP(C) No. 60/2025, has duly been complied with by the alleged contemnor No. 1. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. A copy of the communication dated 28.09.2026, along with its annexures, is kept on record and marked as document “X”.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant