Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/217/2026 of The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs Yager Yuto on 9 November 2026
GAHC040015742026 2026:GAU-AP:1127 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : IA(C)/217/2026 The Oriental Insurance Company Limited represented by the Branch Manager, North Lakhimpur Branch, having its Regional Office at Ulubari Guwahati-7, PO
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040015742026
2026:GAU-AP:1127
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : IA(C)/217/2026
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
represented by the Branch Manager, North Lakhimpur Branch, having its Regional Office at Ulubari Guwahati-7, PO and PS Paltan Bazar, Kamrup Metro District, Assam. 780007
VERSUS
Yager Yuto
Wife of Late Toduk Yuto, resident of Puam/ Hone, PO and PS Tato, Shi Yomi District, Arunachal Pradesh 791001
Advocate for the Petitioner : Uttam Deka, Sange Drema Philley Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Date : 10-11-2026
The instant application under section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 has been preferred by the applicant/Insurance company praying for condonation of delay of 161 days in filing the connected MAC appeal against the impugned judgment and order dated 09.01.2026 passed in MACT Case Page No.# 2/2 No.01/2021 by the learned MACT, East Siang District Pasighat Arunachal Pradesh. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant Mr. U. Deka. Also heard Mr. B.R Das, learned counsel for the respondent/opposite party. By filing the instant application, the applicant has prayed for condonation of 161 days delay in filing the connected appeal and the reasons for the delay has been set out at 2(A) (B) (C) and (D) of the application. I have gone through the pleadings and I am of the view that the applicant has been able to show sufficient cause for the delay of 161 days in filing the connected MAC appeal. Accordingly, the delay of 161 days is condoned and the application is allowed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant