Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/688/2026 of TUTA MIAH AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 12 November 2026
GAHC010139542026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/688/2026 TUTA MIAH AND ANR SON OF LATE SURAT ALI R/O VILL.- UTTAR KHARUAPARA P.S.- BARPETA DISTRICT- BARPETA ASSAM. 2: FULBAR ALI SON OF MIRJAHAN ALI R/O VILL.-
GAHC010139542026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/688/2026
TUTA MIAH AND ANR
SON OF LATE SURAT ALI
R/O VILL.- UTTAR KHARUAPARA
P.S.- BARPETA
DISTRICT- BARPETA
ASSAM.
2: FULBAR ALI
SON OF MIRJAHAN ALI
R/O VILL.- UTTAR KHARUAPARA
P.S.- BARPETA
DISTRICT- BARPETA
ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
ASSAM
2:RAFIKUL ISLAM
SON OF MUSLEM ALI
R/O VILL.- UTTAR KHARUAPARA
P.S.- BARPETA
DISTRICT- BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781309.
------------
Advocate for : MR. A CHAUDHURY
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
Linked Case : Crl.A./242/2026
TUTA MIAH AND ANR
SON OF LATE SURAT ALI, R/O VILL.- UTTAR KHARUAPARA, P.S.- BARPETA, DISTRICT- BARPETA, ASSAM.
2: FULBAR ALI
SON OF MIRJAHAN ALI
R/O VILL.- UTTAR KHARUAPARA
P.S.- BARPETA
DISTRICT- BARPETA
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:RAFIKUL ISLAM
SON OF MUSLEM ALI
R/O VILL.- UTTAR KHARUAPARA
P.S.- BARPETA
DISTRICT- BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781309
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A CHAUDHURY, MR. D BORA,MR. N MAHAJAN,MR. P K
DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 13.11.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J)
1. Heard Mr. D. Bora, learned counsel for the applicants/appellants, who has prayed for suspending the sentence being undergone by the applicants, pursuant to their conviction under Sections 323/302/34 IPC, in relation to the impugned Judgment and Order dated 10/06/2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Barpeta in Sessions Case No.86/2018 arising out of Barpeta P.S. Case No. 544/2018.
2. We have perused the impugned judgment wherein extracts of the testimony of the Prosecution witnesses have been shown.
3. Para 14 of the impugned judgment shows that Tuta Miah had pressed the neck of the deceased, while the other appellants had assaulted the deceased. Thereafter, Tuta Mia, Lal Bahadur, and Fulbar had boxed the deceased, which eventually led to the death of the deceased.
4. On considering that there are eyewitnesses to the assault made on the deceased by the present applicants/ appellants, we are not inclined to allow the present application for suspending the sentence at this stage.
5. The application is accordingly rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant