Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/166/2025 of JAKIR HUSSAIN Vs MAMATA HOJAI on 10 November 2026
GAHC010058022025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/166/2025 JAKIR HUSSAIN S/O MD. EYASHIN ALI, R/O PRAGATI NAGAR, P.O.- BHALUKDUBI, P.S.- GOALPARA, DIST- GOALPARA, PIN-783101, ASSAM VERSUS MAMATA HOJAI DIRECTOR
GAHC010058022025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/166/2025
JAKIR HUSSAIN
S/O MD. EYASHIN ALI, R/O PRAGATI NAGAR, P.O.- BHALUKDUBI, P.S.- GOALPARA, DIST- GOALPARA, PIN-783101, ASSAM
VERSUS
MAMATA HOJAI
DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, ASSAM CUM MEMBER
SECRETARY, STATE SELECTION COMMITTEE, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-781019
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K DAS, MR A I TALUKDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA, MR. U SARMA,MR S M T CHISTIE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NCHUMBEMO MOZHUI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
11/11/2026 Heard Mr. S. Lahan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. In terms of the direction issued by this Hon’ble Court by judgment and order dated 22.01.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 3272/2024, the respondent has complied with the court order. The speaking order bearing No. E-417534/339 dated 10.11.2026 have been issued whereby the authority concerned in compliance with the court order dated 22.01.2025 passed in the above referred writ petition had been directed/permitted to hold the post of I/c Principal of the Krishnai Higher Secondary School, Goalpara, in addition to discharging his normal duty as Post Graduate Teacher, along with the financial powers admissible under Rule 49(c) of the State Fundamental Rules and Subsidiary Rules (Frs & Srs), including the power to draw and disburse the salaries of the staff of the School, in place of the Inspector of Schools, G.D.C., Goalpara. Simultaneously, the Inspector of School, G.D.C., Goalpara hereby relieved from the aforesaid charge.
3. A clear reading of the speaking order indicates that the direction issued by this Hon’ble Court has been complied with, and as such, the counsel for the respondent prays that the contempt proceeding may be closed as complied with.
4. The counsel for the petitioner has no objection, as the grievances said forth by him in the writ petition has been addressed to by the respondent authority. Accordingly, the contempt proceeding against the contemnor/respondent is closed.
5. Contempt petition stands disposed of. No order as to cost.
6. A copy of the order dated 10.11.2026 is kept on record and marked as “X”.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant