Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6113/2026 of JACHIMUDDIN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM 5 ORS on 10 November 2026
GAHC010239082026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6113/2026 JACHIMUDDIN S/O- SABDER ALI, RESIDENT OF VILL- BALARTARI, P.O.- CHENIMARI, P.S.- TARABARI, BARPETA, PIN-781305, DISTRICT- BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010239082026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6113/2026
JACHIMUDDIN
S/O- SABDER ALI, RESIDENT OF VILL- BALARTARI, P.O.- CHENIMARI, P.S.- TARABARI, BARPETA, PIN-781305, DISTRICT- BARPETA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUE MANAGEMENT DISASTER
DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI - 781006, ASSAM.
2:THE DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS ASSAM
RUPNAGAR
GUWAHATI - 781032
ASSAM.
3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
BARPETA DISTRICT
BARPETA
ASSAM.
4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
BARPETA REVENUE CIRCLE
BARPETA
ASSAM.
5:THE SUB - REGISTRAR REGISTRAR
BARPETA
ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/2
6:KISHORI MOHAN DAS
AGED ABOUT-39 YEARS
S/O- SIBARAM DAS
RESIDENT OF VILL- BARPETA TOWN WARD NO. 9
BRINDABANHATI
P.O. P.S.- BARPETA
PIN-781301 DISTRICT- BARPETA
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MD. H BHUYAN, S BARMAN,MR. M R Z CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
11.11
.2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they have enclosed the wrong documents and therefore, they would like to withdraw the writ petition and refile the same by enclosing the correct documents. The prayer made is not objected by Mr. N. Das, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents. Considering the same, this writ petition accordingly, stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty. JUDGE Comparing Assistant