Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6775/2023 of PRADIP KR. BASUMATARY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS on 10 November 2026
GAHC010256982023 2026:GAU-AS:16561 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6775/2023 PRADIP KR. BASUMATARY S/O- NAMAL CH. BASUMATARY, R/O- TULSHIBIL, P.O. TULSHIBIL, P.S. GOSSAIGAON, DIST. KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
GAHC010256982023
2026:GAU-AS:16561
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6775/2023
PRADIP KR. BASUMATARY
S/O- NAMAL CH. BASUMATARY, R/O- TULSHIBIL, P.O. TULSHIBIL, P.S.
GOSSAIGAON, DIST. KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST
ASSAM
ARAYAN BHAWAN
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI-37.
3:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
BTC
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 783370.
4:THE SECRETARY
BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL (BTC)
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 783370.
5:THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST-CUM-
COUNCIL
HEAD OF DEPARTMENT (CHD)
FOREST
BTC
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 783370.
6:THE CONSERVATOR OF FOREST
BTC
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 783370.
7:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
PARBATJHORA DIVISION
SUPARIGHAT
BTC
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 783339.
8:THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER
KHORAGHAT RANGE OFFICE
KHORAGHAT
BAGRIBARI
BTC
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 783349.
9:THE SECRETARY
STATE EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE (SEAC) AND STATE
ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY (SEIAA)
ASSAM
BAMUNIMAIDAM
GUWAHATI-21
For the Petitioner(s) : None appears.
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N. R. Sharma, SC, BTC
: Mr. I. Borthakur, SC, Forest
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 11.11.2026
Petitioner is not represented.
2. It is also seen from the Office Note as well as the order of the Lawazima Court that no steps have been taken by the Petitioner upon the Respondent No.9.
3. Taking into account the above, it appears that the Petitioner has lost interest in the present proceedings for which the instant writ petition stands closed for non-prosecution.
4. Interim order passed if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant