Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/1115/2026 of SRI RAJESH SAROTHI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 2 November 2026
GAHC010240852026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.A./392/2026 SRI RAJESH SAROTHI S/O- SRI PHAGU SARATHI, R/O- SANKAR GAON, P.S. AND P.O.- URIAMGHAT, PIN CODE- 785601, DISTRICT- GOLAGHAT, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
GAHC010240852026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.A./392/2026
SRI RAJESH SAROTHI
S/O- SRI PHAGU SARATHI, R/O- SANKAR GAON, P.S. AND P.O.- URIAMGHAT, PIN CODE- 785601, DISTRICT- GOLAGHAT, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Advocate for the Petitioner : M. K. BORAH, MR D J BORO,C SAIKIA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : I.A.(Crl.)/1115/2026
SRI RAJESH SAROTHI
S/O SRI PHAGU SARATHI
R/O- SANKAR GAON
P.S. AND P.O.- URIAMGHAT
PIN CODE- 785601
DISTRICT- GOLAGHAT
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
------------
Advocate for : M. K. BORAH
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
03.11.2026
Heard Mr. D.J. Boro, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P. for the State respondents. The instant application has been filed under Section 430 BNSS for suspension of sentence and bail with regard to judgment dated 11.09.2026 and order of sentence dated 15.09.2026. It is stated and submitted that the petitioner is presently on bail and by this interlocutory application under invoking Section 430 BNSS, he is seeking suspension of the sentence and continuance of the previous bail. Considering the nature of the sentence and the fact that the petitioner is on bail, it is directed that the execution of the order of sentence dated 15.09.2026 in Sessions Case No. 17/2021 (arising out of Uriamghat P.S. Case No. 47/2020) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Golaghat, shall remain suspended till the disposal of the main appeal and the appellant/applicant is hereby allowed to remain on his previous bail, subject to the condition that:-
(i) He shall be available to receive the appellate judgment and,
(ii) He shall not in any manner harass or intimidate or harm any of the witnesses whom might have deposed during the trial. Accordingly, this I.A. stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant