Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5340/2026 of GS-183761W UDC SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN PANDEY Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS on 2 November 2026
GAHC010212642026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5340/2026 GS-183761W UDC SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN PANDEY S/O- SRI SATYENDRA PANDEY, PRESENTLY SERVING AS UPPER DIVISION CLERK (UDC) HAVING PERMANENT RESIDENT AT VPO- UDWANT
GAHC010212642026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5340/2026
GS-183761W UDC SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN PANDEY
S/O- SRI SATYENDRA PANDEY, PRESENTLY SERVING AS UPPER DIVISION
CLERK (UDC) HAVING PERMANENT RESIDENT AT VPO- UDWANT NAGAR, DIST.- BHOJPUR, BIHAR-802210 AND PRESENTLY POSTED AT 1159 (I)
WORKSHOP PLATOON 99 APO, PIN- 931159.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY JOINT SECRETARY (BR-WING), MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
(EARLIER DESIGNATED AS SECRETARY (BRDB), ROOM NO. 418, B-WING
4TH FLOOR SENA BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-110011.
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
BORDER ROADS ORGANIZATION
SEEMA SADAK BHAWAN
RING ROAD
DELHI CANTT.
NEW DELHI- 110 010.
3:ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL (EAST)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
LANKESWAR
JALUKBARI
GUWAHATI
99 APO
PIN- 900885.
4:THE SENIOR RECORDS OFFICER
RECORD OFFICE
GREF
DIGHI CAMP
PUNE - 15
MAHARASHTRA
5:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
HQ CE (P) SEWAK
PIN- 931714
C/O 99 APO.
6:THE COMMANDER
HQ 15 TF
99 APO
PIN- 930015.
7:THE OFFICER COMMANDING
1159 (I) WORKSHOP (GREF)
.99 APO
PIN- 931159
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D BORAH, Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MS P BORAH,MS P BORAH(C.G.C.)R1
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
03.11.2026 Heard Shri D. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. P. Borah, learned C.G.C. The writ petition was instituted with the grievance pertaining to consequent action for release and enabling the petitioner to join his new place of posting at Delhi. Shri Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that recently on 22.10.2026, the posting order of the petitioner itself has been cancelled. In that view of the matter, there may not be any surviving cause of action to be espoused. The writ petition accordingly stands closed.
Closure of this writ petition shall not cause any prejudice, if the petitioner intends to challenge the posting order in accordance with law.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant