Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./3349/2026 of HAFIZUL HOQUE Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 2 November 2026
GAHC010227852026 2026:GAU-AS:16075 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3349/2026 HAFIZUL HOQUE SON OF HAKIM ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- ONDULAJHAR, P.O- DHULA P.S.-DHULA, DISTRICT- DARRANG, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010227852026
2026:GAU-AS:16075
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./3349/2026
HAFIZUL HOQUE
SON OF HAKIM ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- ONDULAJHAR, P.O- DHULA
P.S.-DHULA, DISTRICT- DARRANG, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A K AZAD, MR. I HUSSAIN,MR A K KHAN,A M
RAHMAN,MR N JAMAL
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 03-11-2026 Heard Mr. A. K. Azad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional PP for the State.
2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail under section 483 of the BNSS in connection with Jalukbari PS Case No. 370/2026 under Sections Page No.# 2/2 61(2)/123/140(4)/64 BNS.
3. The gist of the allegations in the FIR dated 28.09.2026 lodged by the victim girl herself is that, the present petitioner called her from Jorhat for giving her a job, whereupon, she came and the number of one Chanamiya was given to her for her to contact and thereafter, the said Chanamiya took her to one Guest house/hotel in Guwahati where she was subjected to intoxication and rape.
4. The case diary has been received.
5. Perused the relevant portions thereof including the statements of the girl before the police as well as before the learned JMFC.
6. The statements of the victim girl lends support to the allegations in the FIR. The investigation is in progress. At this stage, considering the nature of the allegations and the materials reveal that it would prudent not to grant bail to the accused.
7. Accordingly, the bail application stands rejected at this stage.
8. Return the CD. JUDGE Comparing Assistant