Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./3220/2026 of RUBUL AHMED Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 2 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010224942026 2026:GAU-AS:16073 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3220/2026 RUBUL AHMED SON OF LATE JAINAL ABEDIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO 4 BORTOLA, P/S. MUKALMUA, DISTRICT NALBARI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP

GAHC010224942026

2026:GAU-AS:16073

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./3220/2026

RUBUL AHMED

SON OF LATE JAINAL ABEDIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO 4 BORTOLA, P/S. MUKALMUA, DISTRICT NALBARI, ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REP BY THE PP, ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R ALI, N PERVIN,MR. MUSTAFA HUSSAIN,MR H A

AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 03-11-2026 Heard Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M. P. Goswami, learned Additional PP for the State.

2. Invoking section 483 BNSS, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Goreswar PS Case No. 70/2026 under section 140(3)/127(4)

BNS. The petitioner was arrested on 27.09.2026.

3. The gist of the allegations in the FIR dated 26.09.2026 is about kidnapping of the informant’s daughter whose age has been indicated to be 22 years.

4. As per the order dated 28.09.2026, passed by the learned CJM, Baksa, the girl has been recovered and forwarded for recording her statement under Section 183 BNSS.

5. Pursuant to calling of the case diary, the prosecution submits that in the meantime, upon completion of investigation, chargesheet has been filed vide CS No. 67/2026 dated 28.10.2026.

6. In the aforesaid order dated 28.09.2026, it is also mentioned by the learned Magistrate that the victim is a major.

7. In view of the completion of the investigation and in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 30,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Baksa, subject to the conditions that:- i. He shall be available for trial, if one commences; ii. He shall not hamper or tamper with evidence; iii. He shall not in any manner harass, harm or intimidate the victim girl or family members.

8. Violation of any of the bail conditions would entail cancellation of the bail.

9. Bail application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead