Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CCP(S)/10/2025 of FAROOQ AHMAD BHAT Vs FAREED AHMAD SHEIKH,TEHSILDAR on 2 November 2026
No. 65 Regular... HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR ******* CCP(S) 10/2025 in WP(C) 2930/2024 FAROOQ AHMAD BHAT …Petitioner (s) Through: Mr. Prince Hamza, Advocate Ms. Gousun Nisa, Advocate. VERSUS FAREED AHMAD SHEIKH, TEHSILDAR Through: …Respondent(s) CORAM:
Serial No. 65
Regular...
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
*******
CCP(S) 10/2025 in WP(C) 2930/2024
FAROOQ AHMAD BHAT
…Petitioner (s)
Through:
Mr. Prince Hamza, Advocate
Ms. Gousun Nisa, Advocate.
VERSUS
FAREED AHMAD SHEIKH, TEHSILDAR
Through:
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02-11-2026
01. The petitioner, through the medium of the present petition, has sought implementation of the interim order dated 16th of December, 2024, passed by the Writ Court, whereby the parties were directed to maintain status quo with regard to the property in dispute.
02. Statement of facts has been filed by the a contemnor, Tehsildar, Keegam. In the statement of facts, it has been submitted that, upon receipt of the order dated 16th of December, 2024, only a report was sought from the Naib Tehsildar, Keegam, regarding implementation of the order in letter and spirit. The officer has undertaken to implement the order of the Court.
03. In view of the above, the present contempt proceedings are closed. The contempt petition stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Dhar)
Judge
SRINAGAR 02-11-2026 Showkat Khan