Jharkhand High Court
W.P.(Cr.)/437/2026 of SHABANA TASLIM Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 November 2026
No. ( 2026:JHHC:32624 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 437 of 2026 Shabana Taslim ... … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director General of Police, Jharkhand 3. Senior Superintendent of Police, East Singhbhum, Town- Jamshedpur, Jharkhand 4. The
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:32624 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(Cr.) No. 437 of 2026
Shabana Taslim
... … Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. The Director General of Police, Jharkhand
3. Senior Superintendent of Police, East Singhbhum, Town- Jamshedpur, Jharkhand
4. The Officer In-Charge of Azad Nagar Police Station, P.O. & P.S. Azad Nagar, Town-Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand
5. The Investigating Officer of Azad Nagar P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025, P.O. & P.S. Azad Nagar, Town- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum
6. Sitara Jabi @ Nagma
7. Shaan Zama Khan @ Lucky ... … Respondents
---------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Aman Ali, Adv. For the Respondents : None
---------
02/06.11.2026 Heard Mr. Aman Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner. As usual none appears on behalf of the State.
In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondents to properly investigate Azad Nagar P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025.
In the context of the prayer made in this writ application, reference is made to the case of “Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. and Ors.”, reported in (2008) 2 SCC 409, wherein it has been held as follows: “26. If a person has a grievance that his FIR has not been registered by the police station his first remedy is to approach the Superintendent of Police under Section 154(3) CrPC or other police officer referred to in Section 36 CrPC. If despite approaching the Superintendent of Police or the officer referred to in Section 36 his grievance still persists, then he can approach a Magistrate under Section 156(3) CrPC instead of rushing to the High Court by way of a writ petition or a petition under Section 482 CrPC. Moreover, he has a further remedy of filing a criminal complaint under Section 200 CrPC. Why then should writ petitions or Section 482 petitions be entertained when there are so many alternative remedies?
27. As we have already observed above, the Magistrate has very wide powers to direct registration of an FIR and to ensure a proper investigation and for this purpose he can monitor the investigation to ensure that the investigation is done properly (though he cannot investigate himself). The High Court should discourage the practice of filing a writ petition or petition under Section 482 CrPC simply because a person has a grievance that his FIR has not been registered by the police, or after being registered, proper investigation has not been done by the police. For this grievance, the remedy lies under Sections 36 and 154(3) before the police officers concerned, and if that is of no avail, under Section 156(3) CrPC before the Magistrate or by filing a criminal complaint under Section 200 CrPC and not by filing a writ petition or a petition under Section 482 CrPC.”
In view of the remedy available to the petitioner, this writ application consequently stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to avail of the said remedy.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
Dated, the 6th November, 2026 A. Sanga/- Uploaded on 06 /11/2026
-2-