Jharkhand High Court
Cr.M.P./3062/2026 of KARAN KUMAR ORAON Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 November 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.3062 of 2026 ------ Karan Kumar Oraon, aged about- 25 years, Son of Kajru Oraon, Resident of village- Aswa, Hosain, Ballia PO + PS- Barkagaon (Umrimari TOP), District- Hazaribagh … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:32750] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.3062 of 2026
------ Karan Kumar Oraon, aged about- 25 years, Son of Kajru Oraon, Resident of village- Aswa, Hosain, Ballia PO + PS- Barkagaon (Umrimari TOP), District- Hazaribagh … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ayush Kr. Verma, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl. P. P.
------ Order No:-03 Dated:-06-11-2026
Heard the parties.
This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of B.A. No.6671 of 2026 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 18.07.2026 passed by this Court.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that B.A. No.6671 of 2026 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 18.07.2026 passed by this Court to file a supplementary affidavit annexing therewith the certified copy of the latest order-sheets of the trial court of each of the cases in which the petitioner is involved, apart from that case. It is next submitted that due to inadvertent mistake of the petitioner, the said affidavit could not be filed within the stipulated time which resulted in dismissal of the said B.A. No.6671 of 2026 for non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 18.07.2026 passed by this Court. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 18.07.2026 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said B.A. No.6671 of 2026 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the B.A. No.6671 of 2026 be restored to its original file.
Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, B.A. No.6671 of 2026 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.
Registry is directed to list B.A. No.6671 of 2026 before the concerned Bench after a week.
This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-06.11.2026-Animesh/