Jharkhand High Court
Cr.M.P./2626/2026 of RAKESH KUMAR SINHA ALIAS PAPPU SINHA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2626 of 2026 ------ 1. Rakesh Kumar Sinha @ Pappu Sinha S/o Nawal Kishore Prasad, aged about 53 years. 2. Rishu Kumar @ Sarthak Sinha S/o Rakesh Kumar Sinha @ Pappu Sinha, aged about 21 years Both R/o- Village Tenughat No.3 PO & PS
[2026:JHHC:32744]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.2626 of 2026
------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Rakesh Kumar Sinha @ Pappu Sinha S/o Nawal Kishore Prasad, aged about 53 years.
2. Rishu Kumar @ Sarthak Sinha S/o Rakesh Kumar Sinha @ Pappu Sinha, aged about 21 years Both R/o- Village Tenughat No.3 PO & PS Gomia, Tenughat, Dist. Bokaro, Jharkhand
… Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Manoj Kumar aged about 48 years, S/o Chunnilal Saw, R/o Village Tenughat No.3, PO & PS Gomia, Tenughat, Dist. Bokaro, Jharkhand
… Opposite Parties
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Karbir, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, Addl. P. P. For the O.P. No.2 : None
------ Order No:-03 Dated:-06-11-2026
Heard the parties.
Though notice has validly been served upon the opposite party No.2 yet no one turns up on behalf of the opposite party No.2 in spite of repeated calls.
This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.1967 of 2026 its original file which stood dismissed for non-prosecution on 08.07.2026.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that Cr.M.P. No.1967 of 2026 stood dismissed for non-prosecution on 08.07.2026 by this Court. It is next submitted that as the counsel for the petitioners could not mark the list, hence, no one appeared before this Court when the said Cr.M.P. No.1967 of 2026 was called out resulting in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.1967 of 2026 for non-prosecution. It is next submitted that non-prosecution before this Court on 08.07.2026 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.1967 of 2026 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that Cr.M.P. No.1967 of 2026 be restored to its original file.
Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, Cr.M.P. No.1967 of 2026 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.
Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.1967 of 2026 before the concerned Bench after a week.
This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 06.11.2026-Animesh/