Jharkhand High Court
Cr.M.P./3394/2026 of SANJEEV KUMAR @ SANJEEV KUMAR SINGH Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 November 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.3394 of 2026 ------ Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh, aged about 40 years, Son of Ram Naresh Sharma, resident of Village – Musepur Khaira, P.O. – Arai, P.S. Daudnagar, District – Aurangabad (Bihar) … Petitioner Versus The
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:32739] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.3394 of 2026
------ Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh, aged about 40 years, Son of Ram Naresh Sharma, resident of Village – Musepur Khaira, P.O. – Arai, P.S. Daudnagar, District – Aurangabad (Bihar)
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Ms. Shabina Perween, Advocate For the State
: Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P.
------ Order No:-02 Dated:-06-11-2026
Heard the parties.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of B.A. No.1614 of 2026 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 27.04.2026.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that B.A. No.1614 of 2026 was dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 27.04.2026. It is next submitted that B.A. No.1614 of 2026 was listed before this Bench on 27.04.2026 but no one turned up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls when B.A. No.1614 of 2026 was called out as due to inadvertence, the Advocate’s Clerk could not mark the said case in the cause list; which resulted in dismissal for non-prosecution vide order dated 27.04.2026. It is further submitted that non-appearance of the learned counsel for the petitioner was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said B.A. No.1614 of 2026 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that B.A. No.1614 of 2026 be restored to its original file.
Learned counsel for the State has not raised any serious objection to the prayer of the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, B.A. No.1614 of 2026 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.
Registry is directed to list B.A. No.1614 of 2026 before the appropriate Bench after a week.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:-06.11.2026 Saroj/