Jharkhand High Court
W.P.(Cr.)/443/2026 of PRADIP @ PRADEEP KUMAR SINGH Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 November 2026
No. ( 2026:JHHC:32633 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 443 of 2026 Pradeep Kumar Singh @ Pradip Kumar Singh ... … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Home Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Dhurwa, Ranchi 3. The Director General of Police, Jharkhand,
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:32633 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(Cr.) No. 443 of 2026
Pradeep Kumar Singh @ Pradip Kumar Singh
... … Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. The Home Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Dhurwa, Ranchi
3. The Director General of Police, Jharkhand, Dhurwa, Ranchi
4. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi
5. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi
6. The Circle Officer, Ratu Anchal, P.O. Ratu, Ranchi
7. The Officer In-Charge Ratu Police Station, P.O. Ratu, Ranchi
8. The Officer-in-Charge, S.C./S.T. Police Station, P.O. & P.S.- Ratu, Ranchi
9. Hilarius Minz
10. Arvind Kumar
11. Rishita Raj
12. Shweta Raj
... … Respondents
---------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Resp.-State : A.A.G-III
---------
02/06.11.2026 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.A.G-III for the respondent- State.
In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the concerned respondents to give protection to the petitioner and his well-wishers from the respondent nos. 9 to 12.
It has been submitted, at the outset, by the learned counsel for the petitioner that suffice it would be if the petitioner is permitted to raise his grievance before the respondent no. 5.
In view of the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner he is at liberty to prefer a representation before the respondent no. 5 (Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi) by submitting a representation within a period of three weeks from today and if such representation is preferred the respondent no. 5 is directed to look into the matter and dispose it of by a speaking order expeditiously.
This writ application stands disposed of.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
Dated, the 6th November, 2026 A. Sanga/- Uploaded on 06 /11/2026
-2-