B.A./10616/2026 of SEDAR ALI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 November 2026

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 107 of 2026 for the offences registered under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 3(5) of B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 66-B, 66-C, 66-D and 84-C of the I.T. Act, pending in the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that similarly situated one of the co-accused persons, namely, Umesh Das has already been admitted to bail by this Court in B.A. No. 10205 of 2026 and this petitioner is in judicial custody since 25.07.2026 and charge sheet has already been submitted. Upon aforesaid premise, prayer for bail has been made.

4. Learned Spl. P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and pointed out that as many as twelve crime links have been found against the mobile phone/SIM recovered from the possession of this petitioner.

5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 25.07.2026 and one of the co-accused has already been admitted to bail by this Court and charge sheet has already been submitted, therefore, this Court is inclined to grant bail to this petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 107 of 2026, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The above-named petitioner shall file an undertaking at the time of furnishing bail bonds before the court concerned stating therein that he shall not involve himself in similar type of offences in future.

(ii) He is directed to file an affidavit after a lapse of every three months from the date of release, before the court concerned stating therein that he is not involved/involved in any other similar type of offences on the date of filing of such affidavit before the court concerned.

(iii) Further, the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on each and every date of hearing, except any medical exigency.

7. It is further clarified that if the condition of filing of an affidavit is not complied by the above-named petitioner, then it deems to be violation of condition of this bail order and provides a ground for cancellation of bail and the prosecution shall proceed for the cancellation of bail of the petitioner by filing an appropriate application before the trial court in accordance with law.

8. In case of further involvement of this petitioner in similar type of cases, then the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail of petitioner before the trial court on the ground of violation of the condition of bail and the trial court shall decide the application as expeditiously as possible considering the overall circumstances of the case.

(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)

06th November, 2026

Rajnish/