B.A./9924/2026 of ROCKY KUMAR DAS Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 November 2026

1. These bail applications have been arisen out of the same F.I.R. being Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026. As such, they are being heard together and decided by this common order.

2. Petitioners have been made accused in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026 registered for the offences under Sections 111(2)(b), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66-B, 66-C, 66-D of I.T. Act and Section 42(3)(e) of Telecommunication Act, pending in the court of learned Special Judge Cyber Crime,

Jamtara.

3. Both the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody since 18.07.2026 and the charge-sheet has already been submitted. It is further submitted that the co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court in B.A. No. 10283 of 2026, B.A. No. 10436 of 2026, B.A. No. 10437 of 2026, B.A. No. 10321 of 2026, B.A. No. 10136 of 2026 and 10138 of 2026, and the cases of the present petitioners are at par with those of the co- accused persons who have already been granted bail by this Court. It has also been pointed out that neither any crime link nor any victim has been identified during the course of investigation against any of these petitioners. Upon the aforesaid premises, prayer for bail of these petitioners has been made on the ground of parity.

4. Learned Spl.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of these petitioners but conceded to the fact that neither any crime link nor any victim has been identified during the course of investigation against these petitioners.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

6. Considering the fact that petitioners are in judicial custody since 18.07.2026 and the charge-sheet has already been submitted and the similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court, therefore, this Court finds no reason to take distinct view in case of these petitioners and is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Accordingly, petitioners above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The above named petitioners shall file individually an undertaking at the time of furnishing bail bonds before the court concerned stating therein that they shall not involve themselves in similar type of offences in future.

(ii) The above named petitioners shall also file individually an affidavit after a lapse of every six months from the date of release before the court concerned stating therein that they are not involved/involved in any other similar type of offences on the date of filing of such affidavit before the court concerned.

(iii) Further, the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on each and every date of hearing, except any medical exigency.

8. It is further clarified that if the condition of filing of an affidavits are not complied by the above named petitioners, then it deems to be violation of condition of this bail order and provides a ground for cancellation of bail of these petitioners and the prosecution shall proceed for cancellation of bail of these petitioners by filing an appropriate application before the trial court in accordance with law.

9. In case of further involvement of these petitioners in similar type of cases, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail of these petitioners before the trial court on the ground of violation of the condition of bail and the trial court shall decide the said application as expeditiously as possible considering the overall circumstances of the case.

(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)

06.11.2026 Umesh./Abhishek