Jharkhand High Court
B.A./10538/2026 of HAMID ANSARI Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10538 of 2026 Hamid Ansari, aged about 29 years, son of Nijamuddin Miyan @ Ansari, resident of Bangadhi, P.O.- Jamtara P.S.-Fatepur, District-Jamtara, Jharkhand …. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ….
2026:JHHC:32731
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 10538 of 2026
Hamid Ansari, aged about 29 years, son of Nijamuddin Miyan @
Ansari, resident of Bangadhi, P.O.- Jamtara P.S.-Fatepur, District-Jamtara, Jharkhand ….
…. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
….
…. Opp. Party
…
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
For the Petitioner:
Mr. Anurag Kshyap, Advocate
For the State:
Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P.
…
Order No.02/dated: 06.11.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 48 of 2025, for the offences registered under Sections 111(2)(b), 317(2), 317(5), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 and under Sections 66-B, 66-C and 66-D of I.T. Act and Section 42(3)(e) of the Telecommunication Act, 2023, pending in the court of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per prosecution case, two of the co-accused apprehended at spot and this petitioner is alleged to be fled away from the spot and he surrendered himself before the court concerned on 10.09.2026.
4. He further submitted that one of the apprehended accused person is the real brother of this petitioner and charge sheet qua apprehended two accused persons have already been submitted and this petitioners name has been surfaced in the present case from disclosure of apprehended co-accused persons. He further stated at Bar that petitioner is having clean antecedent. Upon aforesaid premise, prayer for bail has been made.
2026:JHHC:32731
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the fact that this petitioner is in judicial custody since 10.09.2026 and as stated at Bar by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that this petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and it is alleged that this petitioner was fled away from the spot and mobile phone allegedly said to be of this petitioner was recovered, but impugned order does not speaks about any crime link or victim qua the said mobile phone which allegedly belongs to this petitioner, therefore, this Court is inclined to admit this petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara, in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 48 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:
(i) The above-named petitioner shall file an undertaking at the time of furnishing bail bonds before the court concerned stating therein that he shall not involve himself in similar type of offences in future
(ii) Further, this petitioner shall appear before the trial court on each and every date of hearing, except any medical exigency.
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)
6th November, 2026
Suman/-
Uploaded