Jharkhand High Court
A.B.A./5984/2026 of ASHIK ALAM @ AASHIK ALAM Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 5 November 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A . B. A . No. 5984 of 2026 Ashik Alam @ Aashik Alam ….. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opposite Party ----- CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner: Mr. Manoj Kr. No.2, Advocate For the State: Mr. S. K.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:32451
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A. B. A. No. 5984 of 2026 Ashik Alam @ Aashik Alam
….. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
….. Opposite Party
-----
CORAM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
----- For the Petitioner: Mr. Manoj Kr. No.2, Advocate For the State:
Mr. S. K. Dubey, A.P.P
-----
02/05.11.2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with the case registered under Sections 406, 420, 384 & 506 IPC and Sections 66(D) & 67(A) of the Information Technology Act has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He has been implicated in this case merely on the basis of the alleged confessional statement of the apprehended co-accused, namely, Sachin Kumar and Deepak Kumar that the amount obtained through committing cyber-crime was also being distributed to the petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused, namely, Sonu Kumar and Birendra Saw have already been granted anticipatory bail and a copy of the order has been annexed as Annexure-2 to the present anticipatory bail application. The petitioner has got one more criminal case pending against him, however, so far as the present one is concerned, he has been implicated merely on the basis of the alleged confession. He however undertakes to cooperate in the ongoing investigation. Hence, he may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
4. Learned A.P.P opposes the petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest/surrender within three weeks from 2026:JHHC:32451 today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No. 228/2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Satish/-
(RAJESH SHANKAR, J)