Jharkhand High Court

B.A./10205/2026 of UMESH DAS Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 5 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. ( 2026:JHHC:32411 ) Page 1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10205 of 2026 Umesh Das, aged about 26 years, S/o Naresh Das @ Naresh Mahra, R/o village-Sonatar, P.O.+P.S.-Chitra, District-Deoghar …. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ….

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

B.A. No. 10205 of 2026

Umesh Das, aged about 26 years, S/o Naresh Das @ Naresh Mahra, R/o village-Sonatar, P.O.+P.S.-Chitra, District-Deoghar

….

…. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

….

…. Opp. Party

…

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI

For the Petitioner:

Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate

For the State:

Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P.P.

…

Order No.02/dated:05.11.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 107 of 2026 for the offences registered under Sections 111(2) (b), 111 (3), 111 (4), 319 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2), 61 (2), 3(5) of B.N.S.,2023 and Sections 66-B, 66-C, 66-D and 84-C of the I.T. Act, pending in the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar.

2. Submission has been made on behalf of the petitioner that this petitioner is in judicial custody since 25.07.2026 and charge-sheet has already been submitted and he is no more required for further investigation. Upon aforesaid premise, prayer for bail has been made.

3. Learned Spl. P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and pointed out that three crime links have been found against the mobile phone/SIM which was being used by this petitioner and two victims have also been identified during course of investigation and it has come on record that this petitioner has siphoned off Rs.6000/- and Rs.5,000/- respectively from two victims. It has also been pointed out that this petitioner is also having one similar case to his credit.

4. Record reveals that on secret information raid was conducted and this petitioner along with other co-accused got apprehended and from whose possession mobile phones/SIM cards got recovered and during course of investigation crime links have been found and victim has also been traced out.

5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 25.07.2026 as stated by the learned Counsel for the petitioner at Bar and that the charge-sheet has already been submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to this petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 107 of 2026 with the following conditions:

(i) The above- named petitioner shall file an undertaking at the time of furnishing bail bonds before the court concerned stating therein that he shall not involve himself in similar type of offences in future.

(ii) The above-named petitioner shall also file an affidavit after a lapse of every three months from the date of release before the court concerned stating therein that he is not involved/involved in any other similar type of offences on the date of filing of such affidavit before the court concerned.

(iii) Further, this petitioner shall appear before the trial court on each and every date of hearing, except any medical exigency.

7. It is further clarified that if the condition of filing of an affidavit is not complied by the above-named petitioner, then it deems to be violation of condition of this bail order and provides a ground for cancellation of bail of this petitioner by filing an appropriate application before the trial court in accordance with law.

8. In case of further involvement of petitioner in similar type of cases, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail of this petitioner before the trial court on the ground of violation of the condition of bail and the trial court shall decide the said application as expeditiously as possible considering the overall circumstances of the case.

(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)

5th November, 2026

P.K.S./Suman

Uploaded

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead