B.A./10437/2026 of SANWAR ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 5 November 2026

1. These bail applications have been arisen out of the same F.I.R. being Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026. As such, they are being heard together and decided by this common order.

2. Petitioners have been made accused in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026 registered for the offences under Sections 111(2)(b), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66-B, 66-C, 66-D of I.T. Act and Section 42(3)(e) of Telecommunication Act, pending in the court of learned Special Judge Cyber Crime, at Jamtara.

3. Both the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that these petitioners are in judicial custody since 18.07.2026 and the charge-sheet has already been submitted. It is further submitted that two other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court in B.A. No. 10136 of 2026 and B.A. No. 10138 of 2026, and the cases of the present petitioners are at par with those of the co-accused persons who have already been granted bail by this Court.

4. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners Arjun Das in B.A. No. 10283 of 2026, Amrit Ruidas in B.A. No. 10321 of 2026 and Sanwar Ansari in B.A. No. 10437 of 2026 are having no criminal antecedents. However, as far as the petitioner Mozahid Ansari in B.A. No. 10436 of 2026 is concerned, learned counsel submitted that one similar case is pending against him. Upon the aforesaid premise, prayer for bail of these petitioners has been made on the ground of parity.

5. Learned Spl.P.P. for the State has opposed the payer for bail of these petitioners and conceded to the fact that allegations against these petitioners are at par with other co- accused persons who have already been granted bail by this Court. As far as petitioners Arjun Das in B.A. No. 10283 of 2026, Amrit Ruidas in B.A. No. 10321 of 2026, Sanwar Ansari in B.A. No. 10437 of 2026 are concerned, submission has been made that there are no criminal antecedent against them.

6. Considering the fact that petitioners are in judicial custody since 18.07.2026 and the charge-sheet has already been submitted and the similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court, thus this Court finds no reason to take distinct view in case of these petitioners and is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Accordingly, petitioners above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Cyber Crime, at Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The above named petitioners shall file individually an undertaking at the time of furnishing bail bonds before the court concerned stating therein that they shall not involve themselves in similar type of offences in future.

(ii) The petitioners, namely, Arjun Das, Sanwar Ansari, Amrit Ruida are directed to file individually an affidavit after a lapse of every six months from the date of release and the petitioner, namely, Mozahid Ansari is directed to file an affidavit after a lapse of every three months from the date of release, before the court concerned, stating therein that they are not involved/involved in any other similar type of offences on the date of filing of such affidavit before the court concerned.

(iii) Further, these petitioners shall appear before the trial court on each and every date of hearing, except any medical exigency.

8. It is further clarified that if the condition of filing of an affidavit is not complied by the above named petitioners, then it deems to be violation of condition of this bail order and provides a ground for cancellation of bail of these petitioners and the prosecution shall proceed for cancellation of bail of these petitioners by filing an appropriate application before the trial court in accordance with law.

9. In case of further involvement of these petitioners in similar type of cases, the prosecution is at liberty to file an

application for cancellation of bail of these petitioners before the trial court on the ground of violation of the condition of bail and the trial court shall decide the said application as expeditiously as possible considering the overall circumstances of the case.

(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)

05.11.2026 Umesh./Abhishek