Gujarat High Court
SCR.A/966/1999 of SABBIR @ LALU MAHMAD HUSEN SHAIKH THROUGH SARBANU.U.PATHA Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 23 November 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 966 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 966 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- SABBIR @ LALU MAHMAD HUSEN SHAIKH THROUGH SARBANU.U.PATHAVersus STATE OF GUJARAT
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: PARTY-IN-PERSON for Petitioner MS SIDHDHI TALATI for Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
Date of decision: 23/11/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Ms.Talati filed on the record a note of PSI, B.L.Rathod. From this note, I find that the marriage of the relative which was scheduled on 22.11.1999 and the function which was to be there on 23.11.1999 have been postponed. The petitioner also admits this position. In view of this facts, nothing now survives in this Special Criminal Application and the same is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.
�����(S.K.Keshote,J.) (pathan)