Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/12589/2023 of PRABHJOT KAUR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 29 December 2023

2023:PHHC:165954

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2023:PHHC:165954 110 CRWP No.12589 of 2023 Date of decision: 29.12.2023 Prabhjot Kaur and Another ...Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and Others ..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Harwinderjeet Singh Sandhu,

AT CHANDIGARH

110

2023:PHHC:165954

CRWP No.12589 of 2023Date of decision: 29.12.2023

Prabhjot Kaur and Another

...Petitioners

Vs.

State of Punjab and Others ..Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Present: Mr. Harwinderjeet Singh Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J.(ORAL)

1. Through the instant petition, as filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought issuance of directions upon the respondents No.2 and 3, to ensure protection of their lives and liberty at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6, and, also to restrain the said respondents from harassing the petitioners or interfering in their peaceful life.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that since both the petitioners have attained the minimum age, as prescribed by statute, for solemnizing marriage, therefore, they have lawfully solemnized marriage, however, it has caused grievance to the respondents No.4 to 6. Such grievance of the respondents No.4 to 6 has made them apprehensive of danger to their lives and liberty and resultantly, it has constrained them to approach this Court, to seek protection of their lives and liberty. The marriage certificate of the petitioners is available on record as Annexures P-3. The petitioners have also submitted a representation dated 26.12.2023 (Annexure P-5) to the respondent No.2.

3. Notice of motion to the official respondent(s) only.

Page 1 of 2

On the asking of the Court, Ms. Anju Sharma Kaushik, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondent(s).

5. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Tarn Taran, to decide the representation (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their lives and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners.

6. Disposed of accordingly.

December 29, 2023Poonam Sharma

(SUDEEPTI SHARMA)JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/NoWhether Reportable: Yes/No

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead