Gujarat High Court

SCA/4353/1996 of MOHANJI BABAJI THAKORE Vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE on 6 November 1996

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4353 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4353 of 1996

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA

============================================================

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

-------------------------------------------------------------- MOHANJI BABAJI THAKOREVersus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR NM KAPADIA for Petitioner MR. NIGAM SHUKLA, Addl. G.P. for the respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Date of decision: 06/11/96

ORAL JUDGEMENT

This Special Civil Application has been filed by the brother of the detenu. This Special Civil Application is directed against the order dated 4.5.1996 passed by the District Magistrate, Mehsana, whereby the detenu - Dengaji alias Khengarji Babaji Thakor has been detained under the provisions of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985. The detention order was executed on 27.5.1996 and since then the detenu is This Special Civil Application was filed on 25.6.1996 and on 26.6.1996 rule returnable for 23.7.1996 was issued. So far neither any reply has been filed nor 25.6.1996 and on 26.6.1996 rule returnable for 23.7.1996 was issued. So far neither any reply has been filed nor affidavit of the detaining authority has been filed.

The grounds of detention enclosed with the detention order show that eight criminal cases under the Bombay Prohibition Act were registered against the detenu. Besides this, the detaining authority has also taken into consideration the statements made by four witnesses against the detenu's anti-social activities.

The detaining authority has found that the detenu has become a problem to the public order and he has been detained as a bootlegger.

The detention order has been challenged on more than one grounds but at the time of argument the learned counsel has kept the submissions confined to the question that no case of breach of public order is made out.

In view of the reasons given in the judgement dated 4.10.1996 in Special Civil Application No. 3879 of 1996 it is clear that the allegations and the material relied upon by the detaining authority do not constitute a case of breach of public order and at the most it is a case of breach of law and order. The detention order deserves to be set aside on this ground alone.

���Accordingly, the Special Civil

Application is allowed and the impugned detention order dated 4.5.1996 passed by the District Magistrate, Mehsana, is hereby quashed and set aside and the detenu's detention is declared to be illegal. The respondents are directed to release the detenu-Dengaji alias Khengarji and set him at liberty forthwith, if not required in any other case. Rule is made absolute.

00000

pkn

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead