Gujarat High Court
CRA/1263/1994 of HAZIRA AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD on 10 December 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1263 of 1994 with CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1264 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1263 of 1994
with
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1264 of 1994
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- HAZIRA AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVersus RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MS MAYA DESAI for Petitioner
MR SN THAKKER for Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
Date of decision: 10/12/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the notification of the State Government dated 28-8-1997 and the fact that this Court has not protected the petitioner in these revision applications by grant of any interim injunction, now nothing substantial survives in these civil revision Learned counsel for the respondents, after taking instructions from his client, made a statement before this Court that construction has also been completed. So if we go by this last fact it fortifies that nothing now substantial survives in these civil revision applications except to do a ceremonial burial thereof. However, it is made clear that if ultimately the plaintiff-petitioner succeeds in the suit then the defendants-respondents shall demolish whatever construction put by them which is objected by the petitioner by filing of the suit.
In the result, these civil revision applications fail and the same are dismissed. Rule discharged.
***********
zgs/-