Gujarat High Court
CRA/1260/1997 of DHANIBEN MANEKBEN Vs AHMEDABAD PANJRAPOLE SANSTHA THRO'ADM.TRUSTEE on 18 November 1997
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1260 of 1997 TO CIVIL REVISION APPLICATIONNo 1279 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1260 of 1997
— TO
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATIONNo 1279 of 1997
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- DHANIBEN MANEKBEN
Versus AHMEDABAD PANJRAPOLE SANSTHA THRO'ADM.TRUSTEE -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SANDEEP N BHATT for Petitioner MR AJ PATEL with MR TRILOK J PATEL for Respondent No.1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH
Date of decision: 18/11/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Rule. Service of rule waived by Mr. A.J. Patel, learned advocate appearing for the respondent.
2. Heard. Today Mr. S.N. Bhatt, learned advocate for the petitioners in all these revision applications places on record a copy of the civil application praying for liberty to file appropriate suit before the appropriate Court and to grant order of status-quo till the first hearing of suit before the trial Court. Having heard the learned advocates for the parties, I am of the opinion that the following order will serve the ends of justice :-
3. The petitioners in all these revision applications are permitted to file an appropriate suit before the concerned Court. There shall be status-quo till the petitioners move an appropriate application for interim injunction in such suit before the concerned court. The suits and the interim injunction applications sought to be filed will be filed within a period of four weeks from today.
Subject to what is stated above, rule is discharged in each revision application with no order as to cost.
* * *