Gujarat High Court
SCA/12038/2002 of PRAFULBHAI JAYANTILAL SHAH PROPRIETOR OF - Vs DISTRICT COLLECTOR SURENDRANAGAR on 20 December 2002
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 12038 of 2002 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 12038 of 2002
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
-------------------------------------------------------------- PRAFULBHAI JAYANTILAL SHAH PROPRIETOR OF -Versus DISTRICT COLLECTOR SURENDRANAGAR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 12038 of 2002 MR RC JANI for Petitioner No. 1 MS SB TRIVEDI, Ld. AGP for Respondents .......... for Respondent No. 2-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
Date of decision: 20/12/2002
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Rule. Ms.S.B.Trivedi, Ld.AGP appears and waives service of rule on behalf of respondents. With the consent of parties matter is taken up for final hearing today.
2. Mr.Jani, Ld.counsel for petitioner as well as Ld.AGP both agree on the point that the issues involved in this matter are covered by the decision of this court in Spl.C.A.No.7190/02 and allied matters decided on 28/11/02 - 4/12/2002.
3. Therefore the rights of the parties shall be governed accordingly. Since the petitioner was holding valid licence and inspite of the same the decision is taken for cancellation of licence on account of instructions, the impugned order for cancellation of licence is quashed and the petitioner shall be entitled to work as wholesale dealer of kerosene upto the period of validity of licence prior to its cancellation. The petition is allowed accordingly to the aforesaid extent. Rule is partly made absolute. There shall be no order as to costs.
20.12.2002����(Jayant Patel,J)
vinod