Gujarat High Court
ITR/353/1983 of SHREYAS FOUNDATION Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX on 29 November 1996
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 353 OF 1983 Shreyas Foundation, Ahmedabad .. Applicant Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat-I, Ahmedabad .. Respondent Date of Decision : 29th November 1996 For Approval and Signature THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. ABICHANDANI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 353 OF 1983
Shreyas Foundation, Ahmedabad .. Applicant
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Gujarat-I, Ahmedabad�� .. Respondent
Date of Decision : 29th November 1996
For Approval and Signature
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. ABICHANDANI
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BALIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of Judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
Mr. D.A. Mehta with Mr. R.K.Patel and B.D. Karia for applicant Mr Bharat J. Shelat instructed by Mr. Manish R. Bhatt for respondent Coram : R.K. Abichandani and Rajesh Balia, JJ
29th November 1996
Oral Judgement (Per Rajesh Balia, J)
1. The Tribunal has stated the case and referred the questions of law arising out of its appellate orders in ITA 2135 and 2136/Ahd/80 relating to assessment year questions of law arising out of its appellate orders in ITA 2135 and 2136/Ahd/80 relating to assessment year 1975-76 and 1976-77 at the instance of the assessee.
2. Since at the time of hearing learned counsel for the assessee at whose instance this reference has been made does not want to press for answering the questions, we decline to answer the same. Reference returned unanswered.
***