Gujarat High Court

SCR.A/946/2003 of MAHENDRASINH KALYANSINH MAHIDA Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 11 December 2003

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 946 of 2003 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 946 of 2003

For Approval and Signature:

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA

============================================================

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO

to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO

of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?

-------------------------------------------------------------- MAHENDRASINH KALYANSINH MAHIDAVersus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

1. Special Criminal Application No. 946 of 2003 MS SUBHADRA G PATEL for Petitioner No. 1 MR SS PATEL, APP for Respondent No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 2 RULE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent No. 3

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA

Date of decision: 11/12/2003

ORAL JUDGEMENT

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms.S.G.Patel and learned APP for the respondent No.1, Mr.S.S.Patel. Mr.S.S.Patel has submitted xerox copy of the decision taken by the I.G.(Prisons) dated 28-11-2003.

2. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with a request that Government may be directed to take a decision within a stipulated time.

3. Permission is granted. This petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Looking to the facts and circumstances, State Government is directed to take a decision as early as possible preferably within one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Liberty to approach in case of difficulty.

4. Copy of this order be given to learned APP for sending the same to concerned authority.

�����(R.P.DHOLAKIA,J.)

radhan/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead