Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/2100/2023 of BALAI ROY Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 29 December 2023
C.R.M.( NDPS) 2100 of 2023 13 MNS/mb. In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 27.12.2023 in connection with Hanskhali Police Station Case No. 914 of 2022 dated 19.09.2022 under Sections 21(C)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
29.12.2023. 13 MNS/mb.
C.R.M.( NDPS) 2100 of 2023
In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code ofCriminal Procedure filed on 27.12.2023 in connection with HanskhaliPolice Station Case No. 914 of 2022 dated 19.09.2022 under Sections21(C)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985and under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act.
AndIn the matter of : Balai Roy… petitionerMr. Arnab Chatterjee …For the petitioner Mr. Arijit Ganguly,Ms. Sima Biswas
..For the State
1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits thatthere was recovery of 120 bottles of Phensedyl from thepossession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits thatthe petitioner is in custody since September 19, 2022. In view oflong detention of the petitioner, learned counsel prays for bail.there was recovery of 120 bottles of Phensedyl from thepossession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits thatthe petitioner is in custody since September 19, 2022. In view oflong detention of the petitioner, learned counsel prays for bail.
2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the Stateopposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that twopersons were involved and 120 bottles of Phensedyl wererecovered from them. He further submits that the co-accused is aBangladeshi National.opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that twopersons were involved and 120 bottles of Phensedyl wererecovered from them. He further submits that the co-accused is aBangladeshi National.
3. Considering the materials in the Case Dairy and also consideringthat the contraband substance recovered from the possession ofthe petitioner is commercial quantity, we are not inclined to grantbail to the petitioner at this stage.that the contraband substance recovered from the possession ofthe petitioner is commercial quantity, we are not inclined to grantbail to the petitioner at this stage.
4. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J)
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…