T/4/2020 of DR MRS SARMILA CHANDRA Vs THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND OTHERS on 31 December 2020

Conclusion

OD-1 & 2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTAConstitutional Writ JurisdictionORIGINAL SIDE

T/3/2020T/4/2020DR. MRS. SARMILA CHANDRA

VersusTHE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.

BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA Date : 31[st] December, 2020. [Vacation Bench]

Appearance:

Mr.R.N.Chakraborty, Adv...for the petitioner Mr.Swapan Debnath, Adv.Mr.Gopal Chandra Das, Adv...for KMC

Mr.Arindam Mondal, Adv...for the respondent no.7

The Court: Both the writ petitions are taken up analogously and disposedof by this common order.

The petitioner has averred in the writ petitions that there has been massiveillegal construction in the premises no.66, Biplabi Rash Behari Bose Road,Kolkata-700 001, formerly known as Canning Street, Kolkata- 700 001.

The prayer of the petitioner is two-fold. First, she prays protection fromdemolition of the unauthorized construction, allegedly done by the tenantsbehind her knowledge, and second, for apportionment of property tax.

The Court was not satisfied with the submissions advanced by thepetitioner.

Confronted with the queries of the Court, the petitioner seeks liberty towithdraw the writ petition on the ground that certain wrong annexures have beenincluded in the writ petition.

The Court permits the petitioner to withdraw the writ petitions and file thesame afresh with proper particulars.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied tothe parties upon completion of usual legal formalities.

(AMRITA SINHA, J.)

D.Ghosh/TO