Gujarat High Court
ITR/246/1995 of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs BAKUBHAI MANSUKHBHAI CHARITY TRUST on 7 November 2001
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 246 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 246 of 1995
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Versus
BAKUBHAI MANSUKHBHAI CHARITY TRUST
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 246 of 1995
MR MIHIR H JOSHI with MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner No. 1
MR RK PATEL for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 07/11/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH)
In this reference at the instance of the revenue, the following question is referred for our opinion in respect of assessment years 1983-84 and 1984-85:- "Whether, the amounts adjusted for payment to Nirmala Backubhai Foundation for the purpose of development and maintenance of BM Institutes could be said to have been applied for the objects of the Trust ?"
2. We have heard Mr Mihir H Joshi learned counsel for the revenue and Mr RK Patel learned counsel for the respondent-assessee.
3. The learned counsel for the parties agree that the controversy raised herein was also raised before this Court in CIT vs. Nirmala Bakubhai Foundation, (1997) 226 ITR 394 and in assessee's own case being Income Tax Court in CIT vs. Nirmala Bakubhai Foundation, (1997) 226 ITR 394 and in assessee's own case being Income Tax Reference No.288 of 1985 which was decided on 6-11-2000.
4. Having perused the said decisions which were in favour of the assessee, we answer the question referred to us in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.
5. The Reference accordingly stands disposed of with no order as to costs.
�����(M.S. Shah,J)
�����(D.A. Mehta,J)
zgs/-