Gujarat High Court
SCA/2992/1985 of ARVINDBHAI N DESAI Vs O N G C on 22 December 1997
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD cr SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2992 of 1985 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
cr
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2992 of 1985
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? 1 to 5 No -------------------------------------------------------------- ARVINDBHAI N DESAIVersus O N G C -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: Mr.Shalin Mehta for M/S NJ MEHTA ASSO. for Petitioner MR AJAY R MEHTA for Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Date of decision: 22/12/97ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr. A.R.Mehta appearing for O.N.G.C. submits that the petitioner has already retired from the post of Dy. Director, Finance & Accounts on 30.9.94. Since he has already retired, the grievance with regard to seniority is of no consequence now. Mr. A.R.Mehta submits and states that all the retiral dues have already been paid to the petitioner and nothing remains outstanding. It is also submitted that this Special Civil Application was essentially directed against petitioner's transfer order dated 11.3.85 and after retirement now there is no question of agitating against the transfer order. This Special Civil Application has virtually become infructuous. It appears from the order dated 18.8.86 passed by the Court that some points with regard to the challenge to the fixation of seniority only were required to be considered.
Whereas this Special Civil Application has become infructuous,the same is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. The Rule is hereby discharged. Interim order, if any, shall stand automatically vacated. No order as to costs.
-0-