Calcutta High Court

ANTICIPATORY BAIL 112 on 20 June 2003

18.06.2021Item no.13Court No.30Krishnendu

C.R.M. 5343 of 2003 (through video conference)

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 ofthe Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection withMaheshtala P.S.Case No. 112 dated 20.06.2003 under sections302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25/27 of theArms Ac t;

And

In Re : Bapi Mondal

…. Petitioner

Mrs. Sukanya Bhattacharya

Mr. Nirupam Dhali

….for the State

This is an application for anticipatory bail.

No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though thelearned advocate appearing for the State is present. No stepshave been taken by the petitioner after the matter was lastheard on 23.10.2003. It appears that the petitioner is no longerinterested in the present matter.

In view thereof, the present application, being C.R.M.5343 of 2003, is dismissed for default.

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order dulydownloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Md. Nizamuddin, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead