Calcutta High Court

CRM/11297/2020 of KAUSIK SHAW Vs State of West Bengal on 31 December 2020

Ct.8 KAUSHIK/CHC Allowed C.R.M. No.11297 of 2020 (Via Video Conference) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Purba Burdwan Women Police Station Case No.240 of 2020 dated 05.11.2020 under Sections 498A/406/34 of the

31.12.2020Item no. 14Ct.8KAUSHIK/CHCAllowed

C.R.M. No.11297 of 2020

(Via Video Conference)

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with PurbaBurdwan Women Police Station Case No.240 of 2020 dated05.11.2020 under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian PenalCode and Sections 3/ 4 D.P. Act.

And

In the matter of:-Kausik Shaw & ors.

… Petitioners

Mr. Prodip Paul

.. for the petitioners

Mr. Saibal Bapuli, Ld. A.P.P.Mr. Arani Bhattacharyya

..for the State

Liberty is given to the learned advocate for the petitioner tocorrect the cause title, amending the name of the police station,during the course of the day.

It is submitted by counsel that the petitioners have alreadycomplied with a notice under Section 41A of the CriminalProcedure Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, in view ofsuch compliance, there is no necessity for immediate arrest of thepetitioners for the purpose of the investigation.

It appears from the materials on record that the petitionershave made out a sufficient case for being granted anticipatory bail on the usual conditions. Accordingly, C.R.M.11297 of 2020 isallowed, granting the petitioners anticipatory bail on theconditions enumerated below:-

i)The petitioners shall make themselves available forinterrogation by any police officer in connection with theoffences in question;interrogation by any police officer in connection with theoffences in question;

Page 1 of 2

ii)The petitioners shall not make any inducement, promiseor threat to any person being acquainted with the factsrelating to the alleged offences in order to prevent suchperson from disclosing such facts before the concernedpolice officer and/or the Court;or threat to any person being acquainted with the factsrelating to the alleged offences in order to prevent suchperson from disclosing such facts before the concernedpolice officer and/or the Court;

iii)The petitioners shall not leave the jurisdiction of theconcerned Police Station i.e. Purba Burdwan WomenPolice Station without leave of a competent Court.concerned Police Station i.e. Purba Burdwan WomenPolice Station without leave of a competent Court.

In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bailupon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousandonly) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to thesatisfaction of the arresting officer. In addition, the petitionersshall attend the trial with regard to the complaint on every datefixed. In the event of default on the part of the petitioners incomplying with any of the above conditions, the trial court shallbe at liberty to direct arrest of the petitioners without furtherreference to this Court.

Urgent certified photostat copy of this order, if applied for,shall be given to the parties as expeditiously as possible oncompliance of all necessary formalities.

(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead