Gujarat High Court
SCA/10723/1998 of BODAT RAMANLAL HAKSHIBHAI Vs MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER on 17 December 2003
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 10723 of 1998 with Special Civil Application No.10726 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 10723 of 1998
with
Special Civil Application No.10726 of 1998
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
-------------------------------------------------------------- BODAT RAMANLAL HAKSHIBHAIVersus MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: TANNA ASSOCIATES for the Petitioner. MR RM CHHAYA for Respondent Nos. 1-2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR
Date of decision: 17/12/2003
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Mr.Tanna, learned Senior Counsel, appearing for the petitioners, states that the dispute in question is settled and both the petitioners have been reinstated in service and in that view of the matter, he wants to withdraw both these petitions. Copy of the letter received by him from the petitioners, along with the decision of the Corporation, is kept on record in each of these petitions. Petitions are accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Notice as to interim relief is discharged. No order as to costs.
Writ to be sent to the Corporation forthwith in order to apprise the Corporation of the fact that the petitions are withdrawn.
17th December, 2003��( P.B. Majmudar, J. )
*****
(apj)