Gujarat High Court

ITR/282/1984 of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs ASHOKA MILLS LTD., on 20 December 1999

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 282 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA ============================================================ -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 282 of 1984

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and

MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA

============================================================ -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus ASHOKA MILLS LTD.,

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BB NAYAK with MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner MR MANISH SHAH with MR JP SHAH for Respondent No. 1

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA

Date of decision: 20/12/1999

ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per Patel, J.) At the instance of the Revenue, the following question has been referred to this Court by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal arising out of Reference Application No. 241/Ahd/84 and Income Tax Application No. 1026/Ahd/82 for Assessment Year 1979-80:- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in coming to the conclusion that the assessee was entitled to deduction in respect of service fees paid for the trade mark "Tebilized"?.

This question is directly covered by decisions of two Division Benches of this Court - one in the case of Assessee itself reported in 218 ITR 526, and the other in the case of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. RAIPUR MANUFACTURING CO. reported in 231 ITR 559. In the circumstances, the answer to the question is in affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. This Reference stands disposed of accordingly. csm./���-----------------

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead