Gujarat High Court
ITR/282/1984 of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs ASHOKA MILLS LTD., on 20 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 282 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA ============================================================ -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 282 of 1984
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and
MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA
============================================================ -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus ASHOKA MILLS LTD.,
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BB NAYAK with MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner MR MANISH SHAH with MR JP SHAH for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA
Date of decision: 20/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per Patel, J.) At the instance of the Revenue, the following question has been referred to this Court by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal arising out of Reference Application No. 241/Ahd/84 and Income Tax Application No. 1026/Ahd/82 for Assessment Year 1979-80:- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in coming to the conclusion that the assessee was entitled to deduction in respect of service fees paid for the trade mark "Tebilized"?.
This question is directly covered by decisions of two Division Benches of this Court - one in the case of Assessee itself reported in 218 ITR 526, and the other in the case of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. RAIPUR MANUFACTURING CO. reported in 231 ITR 559. In the circumstances, the answer to the question is in affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. This Reference stands disposed of accordingly. csm./���-----------------